Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Study questionWhat is the effect of endometriosis compared to unexplained subfertility on live birth rate in women undergoing IVF and embryo transfer (ET)?Summary answerEndometriosis decreases live birth rate in women undergoing IVF-ET treatment, particularly with increasing severity of the disease.What is known alreadyEndometriosis affects up to 50% of women seeking fertility treatment and is known to reduce fecundity. There remains a debate as to effects of endometriosis on the outcomes of IVF treatment, with live birth being a secondary outcome or not reported in most studies.Study design size durationA retrospective cohort study analyzing data of IVF treatment cycles from January 2000 to December 2014 was carried out.Participants/materials setting methodsWomen with endometriosis (n = 531) and women with unexplained subfertility (n = 737) undergoing a first cycle of IVF-ET in a tertiary fertility treatment center were included in the study. The primary outcome was live birth. Other outcome measures were response to ovarian stimulation, embryo development and implantation rate. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed and differences compared using Chi squared test of Student's t-test as appropriate.Main results and the role of chanceWomen with endometriosis had 24% less likelihood of a live birth when compared to those with unexplained subfertility [odds ratio (OR) 0.76 (95% CI, 0.59-0.98) P = 0.035]. This effect became more apparent with increasing severity of endometriosis. Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, the trend for lower live birth rate remained but did not reach statistical significance [adjusted OR 0.76 (95% CI 0.56-1.03), P = 0.078]. Women with endometriosis were as likely as those with unexplained subfertility to have a singleton live birth when two embryos were transferred as opposed to a single ET [OR 1.38 (95% CI 0.73-2.62), P = 0.32 and OR 3.22 (95% CI 1.7-6.05), P = 0.0003, respectively]. Compared to women with unexplained subfertility, those with endometriosis had fewer oocytes retrieved [(10.54 (95% CI 10.13-0.95) and 9.15 (95% CI 8.69-9.6), respectively], lower blastocyst transfer [OR 0.24 (95% CI 0.12-0.5), P = 0.0001] and a significantly reduced implantation rate [OR 0.73 (0.58-0.92), P = 0.007].Limitations reasons for cautionThe study is limited by a retrospective design. By limiting the study to a single ET cycle, it was not possible to assess the cumulative outcome including use of all frozen embryos.Wider implications of the findingsEndometriosis has similar phenotypes among women in different populations and would be expected to have a similar effect on fertility. These results are therefore generalizable to other populations of women.Study funding/competing interestsNone.Trial registration numberNot applicable.

Original publication

DOI

10.1093/hropen/hoy016

Type

Journal

Human reproduction open

Publication Date

01/2018

Volume

2018

Addresses

Oxford Fertility, Institute of Reproductive Sciences, Oxford OX4 2HW, UK.