Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BackgroundAn increase in effective malaria control since 2000 has contributed to a decline in global malaria morbidity and mortality. Knowing when and how existing interventions could be combined to maximise their impact on malaria vectors can provide valuable information for national malaria control programs in different malaria endemic settings. Here, we assess the effect of indoor residual spraying on malaria vector densities in a high malaria endemic setting in eastern Uganda as part of a cohort study where the use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) was high.MethodsAnopheles mosquitoes were sampled monthly using CDC light traps in 107 households selected randomly. Information on the use of malaria interventions in households was also gathered and recorded via a questionnaire. A Bayesian spatio-temporal model was then used to estimate mosquito densities adjusting for climatic and ecological variables and interventions.ResultsAnopheles gambiae (sensu lato) were most abundant (89.1%; n = 119,008) compared to An. funestus (sensu lato) (10.1%, n = 13,529). Modelling results suggest that the addition of indoor residual spraying (bendiocarb) in an area with high coverage of permethrin-impregnated LLINs (99%) was associated with a major decrease in mosquito vector densities. The impact on An. funestus (s.l.) (Rate Ratio 0.1508; 97.5% CI: 0.0144-0.8495) was twice as great as for An. gambiae (s.l.) (RR 0.5941; 97.5% CI: 0.1432-0.8577).ConclusionsHigh coverage of active ingredients on walls depressed vector populations in intense malaria transmission settings. Sustained use of combined interventions would have a long-term impact on mosquito densities, limiting infectious biting.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1186/s13071-016-1917-3

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2016-12-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

9

Addresses

W, o, r, l, d, P, o, p, ,, , G, e, o, g, r, a, p, h, y, , a, n, d, , E, n, v, i, r, o, n, m, e, n, t, ,, , U, n, i, v, e, r, s, i, t, y, , o, f, , S, o, u, t, h, a, m, p, t, o, n, ,, , S, o, u, t, h, a, m, p, t, o, n, ,, , U, K, ., , V, ., A, ., A, l, e, g, a, n, a, @, s, o, t, o, n, ., a, c, ., u, k, .

Keywords

Animals, Anopheles, Malaria, Cohort Studies, Population Density, Mosquito Control, Uganda, Spatio-Temporal Analysis, Mosquito Vectors