Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BackgroundNucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) based on PCR provide rapid identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the detection of rifampicin resistance. Indications for their use in clinical samples are now included in British tuberculosis guidelines.MethodsA retrospective audit of patients with suspected mycobacterial infection in a Liverpool hospital between 2002 and 2006. Documentation of the impact of NAAT usage in acid fast bacillus (AFB) microscopy positive samples on clinical practice and the influence of a multidisciplinary group on their appropriate use, compared with British guidelines.ResultsMycobacteria were seen or isolated from 282 patients and identified as M tuberculosis in 181 (64%). NAAT were indicated in 87/123 AFB positive samples and performed in 51 (59%). M tuberculosis was confirmed or excluded by this method in 86% of tested samples within 2 weeks, compared with 7% identified using standard methods. The appropriate use of NAAT increased significantly over the study period. The NAAT result had a clinical impact in 20/51 (39%) tested patients. Culture results suggest the potential for a direct clinical impact in 8/36 (22%) patients in which it was indicated but not sent and 5/36 (14%) patients for whom it was not indicated. Patients managed by the multidisciplinary group had a higher rate of HIV testing and appropriate use of NAAT.ConclusionsThere were significant clinical benefits from the use of nucleic acid amplification tests in this low prevalence setting. Our data suggest that there would be additional benefit from their use with all AFB smear positive clinical samples.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1136/thx.2007.083816

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2008-04-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

63

Pages

317 - 321

Total pages

4

Addresses

T, r, o, p, i, c, a, l, , a, n, d, , I, n, f, e, c, t, i, o, u, s, , D, i, s, e, a, s, e, s, , U, n, i, t, ,, , R, o, y, a, l, , L, i, v, e, r, p, o, o, l, , U, n, i, v, e, r, s, i, t, y, , H, o, s, p, i, t, a, l, ,, , P, r, e, s, c, o, t, , S, t, r, e, e, t, ,, , L, i, v, e, r, p, o, o, l, , L, 7, , 8, X, P, ,, , U, K, ., , M, ., T, a, e, g, t, m, e, y, e, r, @, l, i, v, e, r, p, o, o, l, ., a, c, ., u, k

Keywords

Sputum, Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid, Humans, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Tuberculosis, Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant, Rifampin, Antibiotics, Antitubercular, Sensitivity and Specificity, Retrospective Studies, Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques