Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT• The physicochemical properties of racemates and stereoisomers of medicines can differ significantly, and this may affect the side‐effect profile in addition to the pharmacokinetics and intended pharmacology.WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS• This is a study to investigate the profile of adverse drug reactions of racemic and enantiomeric forms of drugs. Our data suggest differences in the safety profile for ofloxacin and omeprazole.• This area requires more work to investigate this for other compounds.AIMSThe objective was to investigate the safety profile of four drugs marketed as racemic and enantiomeric forms in France.METHODSData from the French PharmacoVigilance Data Base (January 2005 to June 2010) were analysed for four pairs of racemic/isomeric drugs. A case–noncase approach was used to measure the disproportionality of combination between adverse drug reaction (ADR) and exposure to drug.RESULTSNo significant difference in the number of ADRs was observed between Rac‐cetirizine/(R)‐cetirizine or Rac‐citalopram/(S)‐citalopram pairs. (S)‐Omeprazole induced more haematological effects than Rac‐omeprazole. Rac‐Ofloxacin induced more haematological, renal and neuropsychiatric ADRs than (S)‐ofloxacin, whereas levofloxacin was associated with more reports of musculoskeletal ADRs.CONCLUSIONSThe profile of ADRs could differ for some drugs marketed as racemic and enantiomeric forms. Further studies would be necessary to confirm these data.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04262.x

Type

Journal article

Publisher

Wiley

Publication Date

2012-11-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

74

Pages

886 - 889

Total pages

3