Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BackgroundAfrican children with severe malaria are at increased risk of non-typhoidal salmonellae co-infection. Broad-spectrum antibiotics are recommended by guidelines but the optimal class and dose have not been established. We investigated the optimal dose of oral dispersible azithromycin and whether simple clinical criteria and point-of-care biomarkers could target antibiotics to those at greatest risk of bacterial co-infection.MethodsWe conducted a phase I/II trial in Ugandan children with severe malaria comparing a 5-day course of azithromycin: 10, 15 and 20 mg/kg of azithromycin (prescribed by weight bands) spanning the dose-range effective for other salmonellae infection. We generated relevant pharmacokinetic (PK) data by sparse sampling during dosing intervals and investigated associations between azithromycin exposure and potential mechanisms (PK-pharmacodynamics) using change in C-reactive protein (CRP), a putative marker of sepsis, at 72 h (continuous) and microbiological cure (7-day) (binary), alone and as a composite with 7-day and 90-day survival. To assess whether clinical or biomarkers could identify those at risk of sepsis, a non-severe malaria control was concurrently enrolled.ResultsBetween January 2020 and January 2022, 105 cases were randomised azithromycin doses: 35 to 10 mg/kg, 35 to 15 mg/kg and 35 to 20 mg/kg. Fifty non-severe malaria controls were concurrently enrolled. CRP reduced in all arms by 72 h with a mean reduction of 65.8 mg/L (95% CI 57.1, 74.5) in the 10 mg/kg arm, 64.8 mg/L (95% CI 56.5, 73.1; p = 0.87) in the 20 mg/kg arm and a smaller reduction 51.2 mg/L (95% CI 42.9, 59.5; p = 0.02) in the 15 mg/kg arm. Microbiological cure alone outcome was not analysed as only one pathogen was found among cases. Three events contributed to the composite outcome of 7-day survival and microbiological cure, with no events in the 15 mg/kg arm. The odds ratio comparing 20 vs 10 mg/kg was 0.50 (95% CI 0.04, 5.79); p = 0.58. Due to the low number of pathogens identified, it was not possible to identify better methods for targeting antibiotics including both the cases and controls.ConclusionsWe found no evidence for an association between systemic azithromycin exposure and reduction in CRP. Further work is needed to better identify children at highest risk from bacterial co-infection.Trial registrationISRCTN49726849 (registered on 27th October 2017).

Original publication

DOI

10.1186/s12916-024-03712-5

Type

Journal

BMC medicine

Publication Date

11/2024

Volume

22

Addresses

MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London, WC28 6NH, UK.

Keywords

Humans, Malaria, Azithromycin, C-Reactive Protein, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Treatment Outcome, Child, Child, Preschool, Infant, Uganda, Female, Male, Coinfection