Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Artemisinins, the most effective antimalarials available, should be endorsed in the first trimester of pregnancy to ensure optimal treatment of falciparum malaria in pregnant women, reports a paper published today in The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

Researchers and pregnant women

9th February 2016, Mae Sot (Thailand) – Artemisinins, the most effective antimalarials available, should be endorsed in the first trimester of pregnancy to ensure optimal treatment of falciparum malaria in pregnant women, reports a paper published today in The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

Noting quinine’s low efficacy and the wide availability of effective artemisinin combination treatments, the study’s authors urge health authorities to revise their current treatment protocols for malaria.

“Because of the risk of miscarriage or congenital abnormalities, doctors are justifiably worried about drugs in the first trimester of pregnancy. We found no evidence that treatment of malaria with artemisinins in the first trimester increased the risk of miscarriage compared with quinine treatment,” said Ms Kerryn Moore, the study’s author.

Malaria infects 125 million pregnant women annually, increasing the risk of maternal and infant death and also impairing the development of children born to mothers infected during pregnancy.

Although malaria increases the risk of miscarriage, the study – which assessed all medical records of 55,636 women who visited Shoklo Malaria Research Unit (SMRU) antenatal clinics since 1994 – found no evidence that treatment with an artemisinin derivative was associated with an increased risk of miscarriage or congenital malformations. The study includes the largest number of confirmed first-trimester malaria treatments with artemisinins or quinine.

A unit of the Bangkok-based Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), SMRU is based in the refugee camps and migrant communities along the Thai-Myanmar border.

“The study adds to the body of evidence that artemisinins do not cause adverse effects in pregnancy,” said Oxford Prof Nick White, South-East Asia chairman of the Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU). “Its findings should help international authorities and national health programmes reconsider their treatment recommendations for women in early pregnancy and reassure women who receive artemisinins that the drugs are safe and unlikely to harm their unborn child.”

Women who get malaria in their first trimester of pregnancy are more likely to miscarry, but under current guidelines from the World Health Organisation (WHO) artemisinin treatment is not recommended, unless their life is at risk. For a decade, artemisinins have been the first-line treatment for falciparum malaria in the general population, but because animal studies have found they are associated with miscarriage and congenital malformation in early pregnancy, their safety in the first trimester of pregnancy in humans has remained uncertain. Therefore, the recommended treatment for malaria in first trimester is quinine – an antiquated, less effective, and poorly tolerated antimalarial.

The study estimated that malaria in first trimester increased the risk of miscarriage by 60%. Recurrent malaria in first trimester, which can be the result of ineffective treatment, increased the risk of miscarriage more than three-fold. The risk of miscarriage following treatment with artemisinins was not higher, and possibly even lower, than after treatment of malaria with quinine.

“Pregnant women are at high risk of malaria and miscarriage in first trimester, so effective treatment is imperative,” said Oxford Prof Rose McGready, Deputy Director of SMRU.  “Artemisinin treatments are widely available, have excellent tolerability, and are very effective. Others have reported that artemisinin treatment in first trimester is also very common in practice, despite current recommendations.”

Led by researchers at the Shoklo Malaria Research Unit (Thailand), The University of Melbourne (Australia), and the Burnet Institute (Australia), among others, the study was funded by the Wellcome Trust (UK) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (US).

Similar stories

Check-list recommended to improve reporting of microscopy methods and results in malaria studies

@Oxford Publication Research

A study to explore the variations of how microscopy methods are reported in published malaria studies has recommended standardised procedures should be implemented for methodological consistency and comparability of clinical trial outcomes.

Receiving and responding to community feedback during health system crises in Kenya

KWTRP Publication Research

The responsiveness of a health system is one of its goals, alongside fairness in financing and outcomes. Listening and responding to the public can make a health system stronger and fairer. However, responsiveness is likely to be undermined, especially for vulnerable and marginal populations, in periods of crises such as disease outbreaks. In the current COVID-19 crisis, there has been more focus on health system control interventions, with minimal consideration of community views. KWTRP colleagues in Kenya consider community engagement and citizens feedback channels, concerns raised by the public and how they were handled, and highlight lessons learned.

RECOVERY trial finds no benefit from azithromycin in patients hospitalised with COVID-19

@Oxford Research

Established in March 2020, the RECOVERY trial tests a range of potential treatments for COVID-19, including azithromycin, a widely used antibiotic that also reduces inflammation. The azithromycin arm of the trial was established to determine whether or not the drug has a meaningful benefit among patients hospitalised with COVID-19. A preliminary analysis shows no significant difference in the primary endpoint of 28-day mortality; there was also no evidence of beneficial effects on the risk of progression to mechanical ventilation or length of hospital stay.

The COVID-19 vaccine: do we know enough to end the pandemic?

@Oxford MORU

Blog by Rima Shretta. Preliminary efficacy results from three vaccine candidates currently in Phase 3 trials have shown an efficacy of more than 90% against the development of symptomatic COVID-19. While these results are promising, all vaccines are in relatively early stages of testing. A comprehensive and transparent roadmap is urgently needed, to determine how limited doses of the first vaccines to be licensed will be distributed, together with which groups will initially be prioritized.

Restoring confidence in science – tinkering in the margin is not enough

@Oxford Publication

Blog by Piero Olliaro, Josephine Bourner and Lakshmi Manoharan. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the limits of the current peer-review model, which is collapsing under the number of articles and volume of information, unable to cope with the conflicting needs for speed and quality of information. The peer review process is often slow, opaque, unaccountable and biased; it is now time to focus on tangible improvements, making transparency our top priority. We need a system reset, not tinkering in the margin.

New study on the risk of Plasmodium vivax parasitaemia after Plasmodium falciparum malaria

@Oxford MORU Publication Research

A new study quantifying the high risk of Plasmodium vivax parasitaemia after treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria aims to identify populations in which a policy of universal radical cure, combining artemisinin-based combination therapy with a hypnozoitocidal antimalarial drug, would be most beneficial.