Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

A large clinical trial in Africa and Asia has shown that a 7 day course of high dose primaquine, a drug used to treat P. vivax malaria, is well tolerated and just as effective as the current standard 14 day regimen, according to a study published this week in The Lancet. These findings have important implications for the treatment and elimination of vivax malaria in the Asia Pacific.

Dr Bob Taylor, right, in a lab with colleagues at a South Sumatra, Indonesia IMPROV study site © 2019 MORU. Photographer: Prayoon Yuentrakul
Dr Bob Taylor, right, in a lab with colleagues at a South Sumatra, Indonesia IMPROV study site

Coordinated by the Menzies School of Health Research (Menzies, Darwin, Australia), the Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU, Bangkok, Thailand) and the Eijkman Institute of Molecular Biology (Jakarta, Indonesia), the IMPROV (Improving the Radical Cure of Vivax Malaria) trial involved > 2,000 patients in Ethiopia, Afghanistan, Indonesia and Vietnam and tested the treatment effectiveness of a high-dose 7 day course of primaquine.

Its findings challenge the standard treatment regimen that has been widely used for the last 60 years.

The WHO recommends that patients with P. vivax malaria are treated with antimalarial drugs to clear the parasites in the blood followed by a 14-day course of primaquine to kill the liver hypnozoites and prevent recurrent bouts of malaria.

Associate Senior Clinical Research Fellow Dr Bob Taylor, MORU, says adherence to the standard 14-day regimen is poor.

“Primaquine is the only widely available drug that kills the P. vivax hypnozoites in the liver, but patients often fail to complete the treatment once they feel better. We found that the 7-day high-dose course of primaquine was as effective as the recommended 14-day treatment,” Dr Taylor said.

P. vivax malaria is a major cause of illness in Asia, Oceania, the Horn of Africa, and the Americas. The P. vivax parasites has dormant forms in the liver called hypnozoites, that wake up weeks to months later causing relapses - multiple episodes of malaria that lead to repeated illness and time out of work and school.

Senior Researcher Dr Kamala Thriemer (Menzies) says a shorter treatment prevents multiple episodes of malaria that lead to ill health particularly in young children and pregnant women.

“The shorter, 7 day primaquine regimen worked very well, with very few people having another episode of malaria within 12 months. Although some patients had minor side effects, the drug was generally well tolerated,” Dr Thriemer said.

The study’s principal investigator Prof Ric Price (University of Oxford) said: “Vivax malaria is becoming the predominant cause of malaria in the Asia Pacific. A short course primaquine regimen is much easier to administer and patients are more likely to complete treatment.

“If used widely, this new regimen could help reduce and accelerate the elimination of vivax malaria from the region,” said Prof Price.

Reference

Short-course primaquine for the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled non-inferiority trial. Taylor et al, The Lancet.

Funders

This research was funded by the: UK Department for International Development, UK Medical Research Council, UK National Institute for Health Research, and the Wellcome Trust through the Joint Global Health Trials Scheme (MR/K007424/1) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1054404).

Similar stories

RECOVERY trial closes recruitment to convalescent plasma treatment for patients hospitalised with COVID-19

@Oxford Research

Convalescent plasma has been widely used as a treatment for COVID-19 but to date there has been no convincing evidence of the effect of convalescent plasma on clinical outcomes in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. Recruitment to the convalescent plasma arm of the RECOVERY trial has now closed. The preliminary analysis based on 1873 reported deaths among 10,406 randomised patients shows no significant difference in the primary endpoint of 28-day mortality. Recruitment to all other treatment arms – tocilizumab, aspirin, colchicine, and Regeneron’s antibody cocktail – continues as planned.

Check-list recommended to improve reporting of microscopy methods and results in malaria studies

@Oxford MORU Publication Research

A study to explore the variations of how microscopy methods are reported in published malaria studies has recommended standardised procedures should be implemented for methodological consistency and comparability of clinical trial outcomes.

Receiving and responding to community feedback during health system crises in Kenya

KWTRP Publication Research

The responsiveness of a health system is one of its goals, alongside fairness in financing and outcomes. Listening and responding to the public can make a health system stronger and fairer. However, responsiveness is likely to be undermined, especially for vulnerable and marginal populations, in periods of crises such as disease outbreaks. In the current COVID-19 crisis, there has been more focus on health system control interventions, with minimal consideration of community views. KWTRP colleagues in Kenya consider community engagement and citizens feedback channels, concerns raised by the public and how they were handled, and highlight lessons learned.

RECOVERY trial finds no benefit from azithromycin in patients hospitalised with COVID-19

@Oxford Research

Established in March 2020, the RECOVERY trial tests a range of potential treatments for COVID-19, including azithromycin, a widely used antibiotic that also reduces inflammation. The azithromycin arm of the trial was established to determine whether or not the drug has a meaningful benefit among patients hospitalised with COVID-19. A preliminary analysis shows no significant difference in the primary endpoint of 28-day mortality; there was also no evidence of beneficial effects on the risk of progression to mechanical ventilation or length of hospital stay.

The COVID-19 vaccine: do we know enough to end the pandemic?

@Oxford MORU

Blog by Rima Shretta. Preliminary efficacy results from three vaccine candidates currently in Phase 3 trials have shown an efficacy of more than 90% against the development of symptomatic COVID-19. While these results are promising, all vaccines are in relatively early stages of testing. A comprehensive and transparent roadmap is urgently needed, to determine how limited doses of the first vaccines to be licensed will be distributed, together with which groups will initially be prioritized.

Restoring confidence in science – tinkering in the margin is not enough

@Oxford Publication

Blog by Piero Olliaro, Josephine Bourner and Lakshmi Manoharan. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the limits of the current peer-review model, which is collapsing under the number of articles and volume of information, unable to cope with the conflicting needs for speed and quality of information. The peer review process is often slow, opaque, unaccountable and biased; it is now time to focus on tangible improvements, making transparency our top priority. We need a system reset, not tinkering in the margin.