Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Adding a third anti-malaria drug to current artemisinin-combination therapies (ACTs) provides effective treatment against multidrug-resistant falciparum malaria in Southeast Asia, say Oxford researchers in a study in The Lancet. Using TACTs should extend current malaria drugs so drug-resistant malaria doesn't kill millions more and derail hopes of controlling and eliminating malaria.

None © MORU 2020. Photographer: Mehul Dhorda
Recruitment for the TRAC II study in Kinshasa, DR Congo.

Adding a third anti-malaria drug to current artemisinin-combination therapies (ACTs) provides effective treatment against multidrug-resistant falciparum malaria in Southeast Asia, say Mahidol and Oxford University researchers in a study published today in The Lancet.

The clinical study is the first to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of two triple artemisinin-combination treatments (TACTs) to treat falciparum malaria. Combining well-matched existing drugs provides mutual protection against resistance. This triple drug approach is used successfully in the treatment of tuberculosis and HIV infections, so using TACTs should extend the useful life of the few remaining effective and affordable antimalarial drugs, the study authors say.

“Triple artemisinin combination therapies (TACTs) were shown to be highly effective in parts of Cambodia, Vietnam and Thailand where most conventional ACTs no longer work. In these areas TACTs could be deployed soon to treat multidrug resistant malaria. Where artemisinin resistance or partner drug resistance has not yet emerged, deploying TACTs could delay the emergence and spread of antimalarial drug resistance,” said University of Oxford Professor Arjen Dondorp, principal investigator of the study and Deputy Director of the Bangkok-based Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU).

 The Tracking Resistance to Artemisinin Collaboration (TRAC) II study is an open-label, randomized trial in 1,100 patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria in 18 sites in 8 countries – Cambodia, Thailand, Myanmar, India, Laos, Vietnam, Bangladesh and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). It investigated two different TACTs, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine+mefloquine and artemether-lumefantrine+amodiaquine. The study found that the new drug combinations were safe and well tolerated and were highly effective, also in infections where the current two-drug artemisinin combination therapies, ACTs, are failing because of multidrug resistance.  

Global progress against malaria has stalled over the past four years. In 2018, there were an estimated 228 million malaria cases and 405,000 deaths (mostly in African children).

The Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) in Southeast Asia is historically the origin of antimalarial drug resistance. In the past resistant parasites have spread from there to Africa, causing millions of deaths. In recent years resistance to artemisinins and their partner drugs in current ACTs have emerged and spread in the GMS. A repetition of the spread of antimalarial drug resistance from the GMS to Sub-Saharan Africa would increase both the number of malaria cases and deaths due to malaria. To avoid a disastrous repeat of history, countries in the GMS are aiming for malaria elimination, but success depends critically on the continued effectiveness of antimalarial drugs – and these are failing increasingly.

“We have an opportunity with TACTs to break the repeated historical cycle of waiting for antimalarial drug resistance to emerge and spread before changing therapy,” said study co-author University of Oxford Professor Sir Nicholas White. “There is a narrowing window of opportunity to prevent resistance derailing malaria control and making elimination impossible.”

Since TACTs use existing, affordable and generally well tolerated antimalarial drugs, they could be made widely available in the very near future. Using TACTs will buy important time before new antimalarial compounds become available and should prolong the life of the existing antimalarial drugs.  

“Widescale deployment of TACTs could delay or prevent the emergence and spread of antimalarial resistance in areas not yet affected by antimalarial drug resistance. It could also prevent the importation of antimalarial drug resistance from the GMS to the Indian subcontinent and Sub-Saharan Africa, which would put millions of lives at risk,” said TRAC II coordinator and article lead author Dr Rob van der Pluijm from MORU.

MORU has begun DeTACT, a large 5-year follow-up project funded by DfID, to evaluate TACTs and have them ready for use as front-line drugs to fight malaria across Africa and Asia by the project’s end.   

“Our new Development of Triple Artemisinin Combination Therapies (DeTACT) project is working with pharmaceutical companies to develop TACTs into a deployable product, using these products in placebo-controlled trials in Asia and Africa, conducting TACT-related mathematical modelling, market positioning and bioethics studies, to provide evidence and strategies necessary to rapidly transition from ACTs to TACTs as frontline treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria, worldwide,” said MORU’s Dr Chanaki Amaratunga, DeTACT Coordinator and TRAC II study co-author.

Funders

The TRAC II study was funded with support from the United Kingdom Department for International Development, UK (DfID), with additional funding support from the Wellcome Trust, UK; Bill & 78 Melinda Gates Foundation, USA; Medical Research Council, UK; and the National Institute of Health, USA.

 

References

Triple Artemisinin based Combination Therapies (TACTs) versus ACTs for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a multi-centre, open label, randomized clinical trial by the Tracking Resistance to Artemisinin Collaboration. Rob van der Pluijm, et al. The Lancet, Published online March 11, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(20)30552-3

 

Commentary

Are three drugs for malaria better than two? Philip J Rosenthal (UCSF), Comment, The Lancet, Published online March 11, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(20)30560-2

 

Background

Determinants of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine treatment failure in falciparum malaria in Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam: a prospective clinical, pharmacological and genetic study. Rob van der Pluijm et al.(2019). The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 22 July 2019. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(19)30391-3/fulltext

 

Evolution and expansion of multidrug resistant malaria in Southeast Asia: a genomic epidemiology study William Hamilton and Roberto Amato et al. (2019). The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 22 July 2019. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(19)30392-5/fulltext

 

Spread of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum Malaria. Ashley EA et al. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 31;371(5):411-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1314981.

 

Notes for editors

The Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), www.tropmedres.ac, @MORUBKK, is a research collaboration between Mahidol University (Thailand) and University of Oxford and Wellcome (UK).

Similar stories

Check-list recommended to improve reporting of microscopy methods and results in malaria studies

@Oxford Publication Research

A study to explore the variations of how microscopy methods are reported in published malaria studies has recommended standardised procedures should be implemented for methodological consistency and comparability of clinical trial outcomes.

Receiving and responding to community feedback during health system crises in Kenya

KWTRP Publication Research

The responsiveness of a health system is one of its goals, alongside fairness in financing and outcomes. Listening and responding to the public can make a health system stronger and fairer. However, responsiveness is likely to be undermined, especially for vulnerable and marginal populations, in periods of crises such as disease outbreaks. In the current COVID-19 crisis, there has been more focus on health system control interventions, with minimal consideration of community views. KWTRP colleagues in Kenya consider community engagement and citizens feedback channels, concerns raised by the public and how they were handled, and highlight lessons learned.

RECOVERY trial finds no benefit from azithromycin in patients hospitalised with COVID-19

@Oxford Research

Established in March 2020, the RECOVERY trial tests a range of potential treatments for COVID-19, including azithromycin, a widely used antibiotic that also reduces inflammation. The azithromycin arm of the trial was established to determine whether or not the drug has a meaningful benefit among patients hospitalised with COVID-19. A preliminary analysis shows no significant difference in the primary endpoint of 28-day mortality; there was also no evidence of beneficial effects on the risk of progression to mechanical ventilation or length of hospital stay.

The COVID-19 vaccine: do we know enough to end the pandemic?

@Oxford MORU

Blog by Rima Shretta. Preliminary efficacy results from three vaccine candidates currently in Phase 3 trials have shown an efficacy of more than 90% against the development of symptomatic COVID-19. While these results are promising, all vaccines are in relatively early stages of testing. A comprehensive and transparent roadmap is urgently needed, to determine how limited doses of the first vaccines to be licensed will be distributed, together with which groups will initially be prioritized.

Restoring confidence in science – tinkering in the margin is not enough

@Oxford Publication

Blog by Piero Olliaro, Josephine Bourner and Lakshmi Manoharan. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the limits of the current peer-review model, which is collapsing under the number of articles and volume of information, unable to cope with the conflicting needs for speed and quality of information. The peer review process is often slow, opaque, unaccountable and biased; it is now time to focus on tangible improvements, making transparency our top priority. We need a system reset, not tinkering in the margin.

New study on the risk of Plasmodium vivax parasitaemia after Plasmodium falciparum malaria

@Oxford MORU Publication Research

A new study quantifying the high risk of Plasmodium vivax parasitaemia after treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria aims to identify populations in which a policy of universal radical cure, combining artemisinin-based combination therapy with a hypnozoitocidal antimalarial drug, would be most beneficial.