Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BackgroundDuring the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, there was shortage of the standard respiratory protective equipment (RPE). The aim of this study was to develop a procedure to test the performance of alternative RPEs used in the care of COVID-19 patients.MethodsA laboratory-based test was developed to compare RPEs by total inward leakage (TIL). We used a crossflow nebulizer to produce a jet spray of 1-100 µm water droplets with a fluorescent marker. The RPEs were placed on a dummy head and sprayed at distances of 30 and 60 cm. The outcome was determined as the recovery of the fluorescent marker on a membrane filter placed on the mouth of the dummy head.ResultsAt 30 cm, a type IIR surgical mask gave a 17.7% lower TIL compared with an FFP2 respirator. At 60 cm, this difference was similar, with a 21.7% lower TIL for the surgical mask compared to the respirator. When adding a face shield, the TIL at 30 cm was further reduced by 9.5% for the respirator and 16.6% in the case of the surgical mask.ConclusionsA safe, fast and very sensitive test method was developed to assess the effectiveness of RPE by comparison under controlled conditions.

Original publication

DOI

10.3390/ijerph18041599

Type

Journal

International journal of environmental research and public health

Publication Date

08/02/2021

Volume

18

Addresses

Department for Health Evidence, Research Laboratory Molecular Epidemiology, 6500 HB Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Keywords

Humans, Water, Aerosols, Masks, Respiratory Protective Devices, Ventilators, Mechanical, Occupational Exposure, Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional, Personal Protective Equipment, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2