Transmission networks of SARS-CoV-2 in Coastal Kenya during the first two waves: A retrospective genomic study.
Agoti CN., Ochola-Oyier LI., Dellicour S., Mohammed KS., Lambisia AW., de Laurent ZR., Morobe JM., Mburu MW., Omuoyo DO., Ongera EM., Ndwiga L., Maitha E., Kitole B., Suleiman T., Mwakinangu M., Nyambu JK., Otieno J., Salim B., Musyoki J., Murunga N., Otieno E., Kiiru JN., Kasera K., Amoth P., Mwangangi M., Aman R., Kinyanjui S., Warimwe G., Phan M., Agweyu A., Cotten M., Barasa E., Tsofa B., Nokes DJ., Bejon P., Githinji G.
BackgroundDetailed understanding of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) regional transmission networks within sub-Saharan Africa is key for guiding local public health interventions against the pandemic.MethodsHere, we analysed 1139 SARS-CoV-2 genomes from positive samples collected between March 2020 and February 2021 across six counties of Coastal Kenya (Mombasa, Kilifi, Taita Taveta, Kwale, Tana River, and Lamu) to infer virus introductions and local transmission patterns during the first two waves of infections. Virus importations were inferred using ancestral state reconstruction, and virus dispersal between counties was estimated using discrete phylogeographic analysis.ResultsDuring Wave 1, 23 distinct Pango lineages were detected across the six counties, while during Wave 2, 29 lineages were detected; 9 of which occurred in both waves and 4 seemed to be Kenya specific (B.1.530, B.1.549, B.1.596.1, and N.8). Most of the sequenced infections belonged to lineage B.1 (n = 723, 63%), which predominated in both Wave 1 (73%, followed by lineages N.8 [6%] and B.1.1 [6%]) and Wave 2 (56%, followed by lineages B.1.549 [21%] and B.1.530 [5%]). Over the study period, we estimated 280 SARS-CoV-2 virus importations into Coastal Kenya. Mombasa City, a vital tourist and commercial centre for the region, was a major route for virus imports, most of which occurred during Wave 1, when many Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) government restrictions were still in force. In Wave 2, inter-county transmission predominated, resulting in the emergence of local transmission chains and diversity.ConclusionsOur analysis supports moving COVID-19 control strategies in the region from a focus on international travel to strategies that will reduce local transmission.FundingThis work was funded by The Wellcome (grant numbers: 220985, 203077/Z/16/Z, 220977/Z/20/Z, and 222574/Z/21/Z) and the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), project references: 17/63/and 16/136/33 using UK Aid from the UK government to support global health research, The UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the funding agencies.