Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

This large-scale systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to collate all reported serious adverse events in visceral leishmaniasis clinical trials and quantify the incidence of mortality during the first 30 days of therapy. The analyses, which included clinical data from more than 35,000 patients, found that mortality following treatment was an extremely rare event and serious adverse events following treatments were poorly reported.

Female patient get a check up in a healthcentre in India © Curt Carnemark, World Bank

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a poverty-related infectious disease that causes up to 30,000 deaths per year, with over 600 million people at risk. The disease causes fever, weight loss and spleen and liver enlargement. If left untreated, it can cause death within two years. Existing treatments are often lengthy, painful, costly and poorly tolerated. However, despite antileishmanial drugs being associated with poor tolerability, a comprehensive library on different safety events following these therapies is lacking.

The authors conducted a comprehensive review of the clinical literature to document reports of serious adverse events (SAEs) following antileishmanial chemotherapies. Overall, mortality following antileishmanial treatment is a rare event reported in clinical trials. Some variation in mortality rates are seen across geographic regions and patient sub-groups, for example, patients with HIV co-infection.

Prabin Dahal and colleagues found that reporting of SAEs was inconsistent in the published literature. The timing, cause and frequency of these were often poorly reported. Furthermore, just over two-thirds of the studies did not provide the standards used to assess the severity of SAEs.

IDDO is working with the VL research community in a new global collaboration to develop a set of freely-available universal standards for the collection of VL data. This collaboration, involving representatives from the VL research community, the pharmaceutical industry, drug regulators, key national and global health partners and CDISC aims to set guidelines that will benefit current and future research into the disease.

The full story is available on the IDDO website

Read the publication: Serious adverse events and mortality following treatment of Visceral Leishmaniasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Similar stories

Oxford University launch new clinical trial to test a treatment for monkeypox

The team behind the world-leading RECOVERY trial of COVID-19 treatments are leading a new study investigating a potential treatment for people who have been diagnosed with monkeypox. The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) has commissioned and funded the study. The first patients have now been recruited.

Using mathematical modelling to fight malaria

Researchers have created a mathematical model to predict genetic resistance to antimalarial drugs in Africa to manage one of the biggest threats to global malarial control.

FORESFA and VIE project meetings

The Medicine Quality Research Group organised a multidisciplinary hybrid meeting at Keble College, Oxford, July 3 to 6, for the FORESFA project ‘Forensic epidemiology and impact of substandard and falsified antimicrobials on public health’, funded by a Wellcome Collaborative Award.

Incomplete reporting of COVID-19 disease severity criteria compromises meta-analysis

Patients affected by COVID-19 should be treated according to the severity of their disease. However, not all key national or international organisations define severity in the same way. This imprecision in severity assessment compromises the validity of some therapeutic recommendations. Using individual patient data would better guide and improve therapeutic recommendations for COVID-19.

A multi-country study of monkeypox being launched – first cases enrolled in Geneva

Researchers have launched a new study to improve our understanding of monkeypox disease. The first patients have now been recruited at Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève (HUG) in Switzerland

Pandemic Sciences Institute formally launched in Oxford

The University of Oxford’s Pandemic Sciences Institute (PSI) has been formally launched at a two-day event at the Blavatnik School of Government, at which the lead researchers set out its direction and strategy for the next five years.The PSI will draw together academics and experts from across the University to build a multi-disciplinary institute focused on reducing the risk from infectious threats through science, innovation and building global preparedness.