Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

A new, large-scale systematic review published in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases has identified clear, significant research gaps in the diagnosis and treatment of Chagas disease. The paper also highlights significant differences in study design, diagnostic methods, duration of follow-up, and the timing of outcome assessment used by investigators even in the last decade.

Two people discussing and pointing at information on a leaflet © Ana Ferreira, DNDi

This systematic review assessed the feasibility of establishing an individual participant-level data platform (IPD), and included clinical data from 23,116 patients from prospective Chagas disease studies published after 1997 with patients receiving a trypanocidal treatment. Researchers found that harnessing IPD from past studies could help to answer some outstanding research questions, and inform prospective data collection. Currently there are very limited options for the treatment of Chagas disease. The two major drugs, Benznidazole and nifurtimox, were both discovered half a century ago and have some limitations.

Existing IPD, collected in past clinical trials and longitudinal observational studies, could be pooled and used to generate new evidence to address knowledge gaps and guide research priorities to strengthen evidence for the treatment and diagnosis of Chagas disease.

The Chagas disease platform, launched by IDDO and the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) in 2019 helps to strengthen collaboration between researchers and avoid duplication, both critical to the IPD analyses efforts.,

The full story is available on the IDDO website

Read the publication 'The Chagas disease study landscape: A systematic review of clinical and observational antiparasitic treatment studies to assess the potential for establishing an individual participant-level data platform' on the PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases website

Similar stories

Watch our webinar - Radical cure of vivax malaria: can we do better?

The three presentations and expert discussion by Dr Rob Commons, Dr Alison Roth and Dr James Watson, chaired by Professor Sir Nicholas White (Mahidol Oxford Research Unit) and Dr Chau Nguyen Hoang (Oxford University Clinical Research Unit), are now available.

Shobhana Nagraj, Women in Science

Clinical Researcher Shobhana Nagraj, from the Health Systems Collaboratives in Oxford, tells us about the female role models who inspired her to follow her dreams

Pilot study detects diverse DNA in ingredients of falsified tablets

A recent multidisciplinary pilot study, originating from LOMWRU and the Medicine Quality Research Group of IDDO and MORU, investigated whether bacterial, plant, fungal and animal DNA in the ingredients and from the environment (eDNA) could be detected from falsified (aka counterfeit) tablets.

Expert Comment: Biotechnology allows us to make unprecedented interventions for conservation

In the wake of high-profile reports on the devastating toll human activity has had on global biodiversity, nations are expected to adopt the Convention on Biodiversity post-2020 framework that outlines measures to ensure humans live in harmony with nature.

Researchers call for antimicrobial resistance surveillance to be improved

The number of studies reporting antimicrobial resistance (AMR) data has increased in Africa, South and South East Asia according to new research in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases.

Meta-analysis informed the updated WHO guidelines for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in the first trimester of pregnancy

A new WWARN meta-analysis, commissioned by the World Health Organization and which informed a change to its treatment guidelines, has been published in The Lancet. The study provides compelling evidence that artemether-lumefantrine should now replace quinine as the treatment of choice in the first trimester.