Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

<ns4:p><ns4:bold>Background.</ns4:bold> International recommendations for the control of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic emphasize the central role of laboratory testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the etiological agent, at scale. The availability of testing reagents, laboratory equipment and qualified staff are important bottlenecks to achieving this. Elsewhere, pooled testing (i.e. combining multiple samples in the same reaction) has been suggested to increase testing capacities in the pandemic period.</ns4:p><ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Methods.</ns4:bold> We discuss our experience with SARS-CoV-2 pooled testing using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on the Kenyan Coast.</ns4:p><ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Results.</ns4:bold> In mid-May, 2020, our RT-PCR testing capacity for SARS-CoV-2 was improved by ~100% as a result of adoption of a six-sample pooled testing strategy. This was accompanied with a concomitant saving of ~50% of SARS-CoV-2 laboratory test kits at both the RNA extraction and RT-PCR stages. However, pooled testing came with a slight decline of test sensitivity. The RT-PCR cycle threshold value (ΔCt) was ~1.59 higher for samples tested in pools compared to samples tested singly.</ns4:p><ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Conclusions.</ns4:bold> Pooled testing is a useful strategy to increase SARS-CoV-2 laboratory testing capacity especially in low-income settings.</ns4:p>

Original publication

DOI

10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16113.1

Type

Journal

Wellcome Open Research

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

Publication Date

06/08/2020

Volume

5

Pages

186 - 186